Back to top

Distinguishing Outcomes-Based Treatment and Evidence-Based Practices

Much has been made about promoting the use of so-called evidence-based practices derived from research studies. In some cases, reimbursements are tied to documentation that such practices are used. Some “evidence” might be based on arbitrary metrics that while scientifically sound is largely irrelevant to the real world. This presentation will make the case that routine monitoring of treatment outcomes is a necessary strategy whether evidence-based practices are employed. Providers can consider either internal monitoring or contracting with commercially available external outcomes monitors. How providers can make decisions about establishing outcomes-based practices will be discussed.

Session Time: 
Thursday, December 9, 2021 1:30 pm to 2:30 pm
Session Category: 
Outcomes Measures
Session Type: 
Workshop
Learning Objectives: 
• List three problems in the use of evidence-based practices
• Describe three aspects of an arbitrary metric
• List at least two factors to consider in deciding whether to use internal or external outcomes monitoring
• Discuss documentation requirements for optimal use of outcomes data
Presenter
Presenter Name: 
Norman Hoffmann
Job Title: 
Founder
Organization Affiliation: 
Evince Diagnostics
Credentials: 
PhD
Norman G. Hoffmann, PhD, is a clinical psychologist who has evaluated behavioral health programs and developed assessment instruments for screening, diagnosing, and treatment planning during a 40-year career. His work formed the basis for the first ASAM patient placement criteria, and more recently he designed the tools for the NAATP pilot outcome study. He has provided consultation services for state and federal agencies, corporations and public organizations throughout the US and Europe. He has authored or co-authored more than 220 publications related to his work. Dr. Hoffmann is currently an adjunct professor of psychology at Western Carolina University.
Year: 
2021